Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Nov 14, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

At 4:17 PM +0100 11/14/06, Joe Abley wrote:
For the benefit of those who do not follow dnsext closely, what friction do you expect?

As Eric stated in his message, we should not rehash old arguments. This has been beaten to death on the DKIM WG mailing list. As expected, different people had different (and, in this case, strongly-held) views, but consensus was reached and agreed to by the AD and with the DNS folks.

To avoid repeating this debate, can someone post some summary information on this particularly including which exact people came to consensus about this. I'm particularly interested in if the consensus included the contributors to draft-iab-dns-choices since that has been raised in LC comments.

Thanks, Cullen

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]