In reply to Joe Abley, Dave Crocer wrote:
I rather thought that the general difficulties (perceived, actual, or otherwise) might be worth enumerating in a more general forum so that they are better-known. I doubt DKIM is the last work which will feature new types of data being stored in the DNS.This is probably a topic worthy of further discussion, for exactly the reason you cite. It is an issue that keeps coming up and keeps causing significant debate. I do not know what it will take to put the issue fully to rest, but it seems clear to me that it needs a focused discussion and effort.Possibly not on the IETF list. I don't know what the right venue is.
See: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsext/draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis/ It is post working group last call, but not at IESG quite yet. --Olaf ----------------------------------------------------------- Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf