Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In reply to Joe Abley, Dave Crocer wrote:
I rather thought that the general difficulties (perceived, actual, or otherwise) might be worth enumerating in a more general forum so that they are better-known. I doubt DKIM is the last work which will feature new types of data being stored in the DNS.

This is probably a topic worthy of further discussion, for exactly the reason you cite. It is an issue that keeps coming up and keeps causing significant debate. I do not know what it will take to put the issue fully to rest, but it seems clear to me that it needs a focused discussion and effort.

Possibly not on the IETF list. I don't know what the right venue is.

See:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsext/draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis/

It is post working group last call, but not at IESG quite yet.

--Olaf


-----------------------------------------------------------
Olaf M. Kolkman
NLnet Labs
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/



Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]