Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 14-Nov-2006, at 17:03, Paul Hoffman wrote:

At 4:17 PM +0100 11/14/06, Joe Abley wrote:
For the benefit of those who do not follow dnsext closely, what friction do you expect?

As Eric stated in his message, we should not rehash old arguments. This has been beaten to death on the DKIM WG mailing list. As expected, different people had different (and, in this case, strongly-held) views, but consensus was reached and agreed to by the AD and with the DNS folks.

Indeed, I wasn't attempting to rehash an old argument specifically about DKIM.

I rather thought that the general difficulties (perceived, actual, or otherwise) might be worth enumerating in a more general forum so that they are better-known. I doubt DKIM is the last work which will feature new types of data being stored in the DNS.


Joe


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]