(Catching up...)
James M. Polk wrote:
...
didn't the IESG, about 18 months ago (it may be longer) write a letter
to either ITU-T or ETSI to stop attempting to extend RSVP, that it was
supposed to be done in the IETF?
I seem to remember that event occuring, though I admit I don't remember
the details; Allison Mankin would know, as should Jon Peterson.
We've made our general position very clear, most recently by
approving draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-04.
We published RFC 3936 in 10/04.
We wrote to ITU-T in 12/04:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file62.txt
They replied rapidly:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file78.pdf
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf