Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Joel" == Joel M Halpern <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Joel> After re-read Brian's draft, RFC 3683, RFC 3934, and the
    Joel> relevant portions of RFC2418 I support the IESG/ADs ability
    Joel> to make longer than 30-day suspensions and to engage in
    Joel> alternate methods of mailing list control, as described in
    Joel> 2418.  I agree that the IESG having only the option of 1
    Joel> year suspension, as required by RFC 3683, is unduly
    Joel> restrictive, does not help us, and should be rescinded.  If
    Joel> 3683 were rescinded without explicitly restoring the ability
    Joel> to make longer suspensions, then we would have to explain
    Joel> what other courses of action we did intend to have
    Joel> available.  Hypothetically, there might be some better
    Joel> alternative, so I am not coupling my response to the two
    Joel> questions.

To clarify, I have not issued the last call yet, I was just forwarding David's discuss comment to the appropriate list and letting people know how I plan to proceed.

There's no need to re-respond to the LC when it does come out though.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]