On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Fred Baker wrote: > We also specifically addressed their requirements (in tsvwg) operationally: > > >http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4594.txt > >4594 Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes. J. > > Babiarz, K. Chan, F. Baker. August 2006. (Format: TXT=144044 bytes) > > (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > > > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr > > "Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes", Kwok Ho Chan, 22-Oct-06 > >and > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-tsvwg-admitted-voice-dscp > > "An EF DSCP for Capacity-Admitted Traffic", Fred Baker, 6-Oct-06 > > The last two are in last call and in discussion in tsvwg respectively. All of these documents are, or are aimed at Informational. I do not see how those could define DSCP codepoints or behaviour -- doing so requires Standards Action and certain codepoint pools are reserved for local/private use (which specifying them is not). I wonder how wide IETF or operator consensus is behind this work. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf