Sam Hartman wrote: > I think the SPF and Sender ID appeals clearly had merit. One decision said "we have found merit", and the other said "we thank"... > I'm not sure whether we rejected them though. ...the latter was in essence accepted, and the former also had some effect, together resulting in the longest IESG note I've seen anywhere so far. The IAB decided that conflicting IETF experiments are allowed if there's an appropriate IESG disclaimer. A kind of "kids, don't try this at home" maybe. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf