Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) > Referenced by: draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis-03, > draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3731bis-04, draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3732bis-03, > draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3733bis-04 > This reference is sited to capture a format that is also available in > the W3C's XML Schema specifications. It can be replaced with an > existing normative reference to the W3C specification. That's odd, why should you be forced to replace a normative reference to the perfectly fine RFC 3339 by some spec. published elsewhere ? AFAIK nothing is wrong with RFC 3339, let's just promote it if that's what it takes to reference it. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf