>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <mat@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Michael> John C Klensin wrote:
>> (1) The "supporter" procedure/requirement should be triggered
>> only is someone shows symptoms of being a vexatious appellant.
>> People who are entering their first appeals don't trigger it.
>> People whose last appeal was successful, even in part (that
>> would need to be defined, of course, and that might not be
>> easy) don't trigger it. The only folks who need to look for
>> supporters are those who have appealed before and whose appeals
>> have been rejected as without merit.
>>
>>
Michael> Can an appeal be rejected with merit?
Yes. I think Robert's recent appeal was rejected that way. I
personally think that Jefsey's appeal against the LTRU registry doc
set was a reasonable appeal although we declined to make any changes.
I suspect many people may disagree with me and argue that this appeal
was without merit.
I think the SPF and Sender ID appeals clearly had merit. I'm not sure
whether we rejected them though.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf