Re: legal issue of RFC3619

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill,

The IETF stays strictly out of such discussions. It is entirely
up to each implementor to decide whether or not the claimed IPR is
valid and to make arrangements with the IPR owners if so.

Please see RFC 3979 for more details, and see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_disclosure.cgi
for all current disclosures to the IETF.

Sorry but this is something your company has to resolve
for itself.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
IETF Chair

Bill Su wrote:
Hi,

We are implementing an Ethernet protection ring. Then we found there is an information RFC3619. It is submitted by Extreme network and its IPR is protected by the company too. We also found there are some patents filed by Extreme. In addition to EAPS, we also found there is MRP from Foundry, EPSR from Allied Telesyn, ERP from Siemens. They are all like the same. Isn't it legal violation? We tried to contact Extreme before. But there is no concrete response on the licensing process. Any comment is welcome.
Thanks.



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]