Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






There has also been a change in the external factors affecting the urgency
of this work.

 At one time the perspective (from at least some of us) has been "We know
we are going to need this stuff sometime in the future".

That perspective has changed to "There are deadlines in place.  If we don't
have solutions in place, our existing services are going to be degraded, or
fail".

This will tend to accelerate the rate of completion of the work.

Janet


ken carlberg <carlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 11/06/2006 12:40:38 PM:

> > It's not clear whether going on this way will achieve useful results
> > in a useful amount of time.
>
> the first part of the above is a matter of opinion, which I'll
> respect but disagree with.
>
> the second is a red herring.  if you wish a more detailed explanation
> of the timeline of milestones in IEPREP, I'll be happy to take this
> offline with you and the working group chairs.  the timeline reflects
> poorly on several people (I'll objectively include myself in one
> instance) and groups and really doesn't need to be brought up here on
> the ietf list.
>
> -ken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]