>>>>> "Janet" == Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@xxxxxxx> writes:
Janet> It seems to me that there are two separate issues.
Janet> First, should this work be done within IETF, or would it be
Janet> better done in ITU (or ATIS, etc.)?
Janet> Second, if it is done within IETF, should it be done in
Janet> IEPREP, or some other working group?
Janet> In Sam's earlier emails, he seemed to be saying that this
Janet> work belonged in ITU. However his latest email accepts
Janet> that a large amount of the work DOES belong in IETF.
No.
I believe that the work specified in the new ieprep charter belongs in
ITU.
I believe that there is work that belongs in the IETF such as
extensions to IETf protocols like RSVP. I don't think that work is
within the proposed ieprep charter
I acknowledged that extending IETF protocols belongs in the IETF. But
IEPREP is not being chartered to do that. I think the things in the
proposed IEPREP charter are not within the scope of what the IETF
should do.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf