Mark, Sam,
It seems to me that a reference from the draft to the code
description or to Bind 9 more generally, with a note to the
effect that Bind 9 is believed to contain an implementation of
what is being described in the document, could head off a great
deal of confusion... including all of the confusion we have seen
in the last week or so.
john
--On Tuesday, 31 October, 2006 08:42 +1100 Mark Andrews
<Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The documents are essentially the same. In particular the
> policy to resolve the handling of multiple dlv namespaces
> which overlap is the same. This was not so in earlier
> versions.
>
> Mark
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf