> > On 30-Oct-2006, at 11:38, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > > > When the statement is "I haven't compared draft-weiler-dnssec- > > dlv-01 with the ISC tech note closely, but since the text is > > different it seems likely that implementations based on one would > > likely differ from those" it should go straight to the bit bucket. > > OK. The two documents have a common heritage (as the respective > acknowledgements sections indicate) but it's not clear from either > document whether they describe precisely the same thing as the other. > I have read both documents and have noted the lack of text in either > of them which would clarify this issue. > > If they describe the same thing, then hooray, but let them say so > rather than requiring people to infer things from their titles. > > > Joe The documents are essentially the same. In particular the policy to resolve the handling of multiple dlv namespaces which overlap is the same. This was not so in earlier versions. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf