On 30-Oct-2006, at 16:41, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
I agree with Olaf's suggestion that there be an action on the document author to add a section explaining the relationship of the draft to existing experimental practice. It seems to me that this is entirely appropriate in a document marked 'experimental'.
That was all I was suggesting.
I don't think that it is appropriate for the IESG to be tasked with evaluating the quality of this work.
I didn't suggest that they should be. Apologies if my commentary suggested otherwise. Joe _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf