SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Changing the subject since this has left DNS behind... just a few points of fact...

--On 22. november 2006 12:41 +0000 Michael.Dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


There were no alternatives to SMTP on an IP network until
Instant Messaging came along.

not since X.400 over X.25 died, no. I thought you were older than that....

but can be seen in IM, and may likely show up in other forms of
communication.  Much of this is simply the nature of software.

It has nothing to do with software and everything to do
with architecture. IM networks have less problems because
all the participants share a relationship with the IM
service providers.

hm. who is the service provider for jabber:harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, and what relationship does he have with the operators of jabber:hta@xxxxxxxxxx? Last time I checked, I could still chat with myself... SOME IM networks enforce such a relationship as the one you mention. not all.

             Harald



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]