RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Robert Elz [mailto:kre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 

> I don't want to continue this, especially as I don't care 
> about this protocol, but ...


>   | In my book deployability trumps pretty much everything else.
> 
> It certainly is important, but being correct (ie: working) is probably
> a little more important...   Avoiding breaking other things is also
> more important.

Which is why the working group has had extensive discussions with the DNS Directorate on this topic. You will be glad to know that you need not worry about it.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]