The statements in this thread about errata are incorrect, at least as far as W3C specs are concerned. For example, if you go to: http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/ you will see the text: Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include normative corrections. The word "errata" in the above links to: http://www.w3.org/2004/12/xinclude-errata If you follow that link, you will find (evolving) errata which *do* apply to the latest version of the spec. Misha This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information company. To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf