> -----Original Message----- > From: Misha Wolf [mailto:Misha.Wolf@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:13 AM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: References to XML 'documents' > > The statements in this thread about errata are incorrect, > at least as far as W3C specs are concerned. For example, > if you go to: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/ > > you will see the text: > > Please refer to the errata for this document, which may > include normative corrections. > > The word "errata" in the above links to: > > http://www.w3.org/2004/12/xinclude-errata > > If you follow that link, you will find (evolving) errata > which *do* apply to the latest version of the spec. I think you misunderstood what I wrote, or at least what I meant. While the errata may be found through a link found on the specification page, they are NOT directly included as part of the citation. It's not too different from how the RFC Editor manages errata except that the W3C makes it obvious where the errata for a given spec can be found by including that link. -Scott- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf