Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:24:22PM -0400,
 The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 18 lines which said:

> - 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) '
>    <draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-01.txt> as an Informational RFC

I've read it, and find no stopping issues. I believe that the
political issue of "who signs the root" is a sufficiently serious
problem to create a temporary workaround like DLV. Good idea, and the
document is OK, IMHO.

I have a problem with section 10. The whole idea of DLV is to be able
to move forward even if IANA cannot or does not want to sign the
root. Therefore, why this section? Is there some mandate from ICANN or
whoever to add it?

RFC editor : note there is a typo in section 3 "zone zone" should be
"root zone".

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]