On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:10:48AM +1100, Geoff Huston wrote: > > >But this is enough about my opinions. Please > >state your opinion -- in the interest of not > >replicating this discussion on multiple lists, > >send follow-ups to ietf@xxxxxxxxx > > > 3 last call comments: > > Secondly, in Section 7 the IANA allocation is described as > "temporary", yet there is no definition of what "temporary" means in > this context. The authors should be consulted to define "temporary" > in terms of clear instructions to IANA (e.g. unitil otherwise > instructed by the IESG, or for 5 years from the data of the allocation, > etc). > > regards, > > Geoff Huston > as i recall, there is already precident for the length of "temporary" delegations. Back in the previous century, the IANA tended to treat "temporary" delegations for experimental purposes to a 12 month window. Five years is effectively permanent. that said, i'm happy w/ the rest of the document. --bill _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf