Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Bradner wrote:
I agree with John K lets purge 2418, 3683 etc of any language that appears to limit enforcement options and work things out on a case by case basis

Just to be clear, the intention of sections 1 and 2 of
draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-03 is to remove the limitations
on 2418 inadvertently introduced by 3934.

That is quite separable logically from rescinding 3683;
hence the form of Sam's questions.

   Brian

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]