Scott Bradner wrote:
I agree with John K lets purge 2418, 3683 etc of any language that appears to limit enforcement options and work things out on a case by case basis
Just to be clear, the intention of sections 1 and 2 of draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-03 is to remove the limitations on 2418 inadvertently introduced by 3934. That is quite separable logically from rescinding 3683; hence the form of Sam's questions. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf