IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: David Morris
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: David Morris
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Nelson, David
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: David Morris
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Second call for nominations: IAOC position selected by the IAB
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
  • From: jarno.rajahalme
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Hesham Soliman
• Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: James Carlson
• Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Soliman, Hesham
• Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Scott W Brim
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: John L
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Dave Crocker
• DOMAIN DISPUTES: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
  • From: Kyse Faril
• DOMAIN DISPUTES: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
  • From: Kyse Faril
• BAOZI BAIDU Thank you for your Open Forum submission.
  • From: Kyse Faril
• RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• RE: Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches
  • From: Ramirez, Luis
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Carl Malamud
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Patrick Vande Walle
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Karl Auerbach
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Simon Leinen
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: John Levine
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Can't VPN (OT)
  • From: Rachel Florentine
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Joe Baptista
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Peter Dambier
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Patrick Vande Walle
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Patrick Vande Walle
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
  • From: Doug Barton
• BaoZi.org vs BaiDu.com INFRINGEMENT CLAIM (ARCHIVES)
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Baidu.com vs BAOZI.org (Hu Nu An Wen?)
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Possible INFRINGEMENT... 'BAIDU.com' et al ("CHINA's GOOGLE")
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
  • From: Jari Arkko
• IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Peter Dambier
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
  • From: Pekka Nikander
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: David Conrad
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Paul Robinson
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Fixing Email administration (including TLS) Was SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re:Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Paul Robinson
• RE: New RR problem not evidence that DNS needs to be replaced (was Re:SRV records considered dubious)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Replacing email protocols: First comes consensus on the requirements
  • From: Dave Crocker
• New RR problem not evidence that DNS needs to be replaced (was Re: SRV records considered dubious)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Something better than DNS?
  • From: Pekka Savola
• The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Keith Moore
• DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Robert Elz
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Robert Elz
• RE: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' toProposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Draft minutes of Wednesday plenary
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Curtis Villamizar
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Robert G. Cole
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Curtis Villamizar
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Curtis Villamizar
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• RE: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• review of draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-05.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Jeffrey Altman
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Willing to serve a new term in the IAOC
  • From: Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Joe Abley
• RE: [Hubmib] Last Call: 'Managed Objects of EPON' to Proposed Sta ndard (draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib)
  • From: Lior Khermosh
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Eric Allman
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: John Levine
• ESP usage at IETF65
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: Ted Faber
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Yangwoo Ko
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: *.ppt slides
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• *.ppt slides
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• Re: Improving Security with Encryption
  • From: Russ White
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Scott W Brim
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
• Re: IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
  • From: Jim Martin
• RE: Improving Security with Encryption
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• Re: Improving Security with Encryption
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• found verizon phone from 339 area code...
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• RE: Improving Security with Encryption
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Improving Security with Encryption
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
• RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Improving Security with Encryption
  • From: James M. Polk
• Improving Security with Encryption
  • From: King, Kimberly S.
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: Joe Abley
• RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: Michel Py
• RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: Lyndon Nerenberg
• RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: Michel Py
• Radia Perlman presentation
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Scott W Brim
• Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Scott W Brim
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, NPE
• Apology Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Scott W Brim
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep)
  • From: King, Kimberly S.
• RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
  • From: King, Kimberly S.
• RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
  • From: King, Kimberly S.
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Robert G. Cole
• Comments on new sipping drafts?
  • From: Rajesh Ramanathan
• Comments on new sipping drafts?
  • From: Rajesh Ramanathan
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, NPE
• Re: Why are we still seeing new Internet-Draft announcements this week?
  • From: James M. Polk
• RE: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Why are we still seeing new Internet-Draft announcements this week?
  • From: Fred Baker
• Why are we still seeing new Internet-Draft announcements this week?
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• RE: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay RoutableCryptographicHash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
  • From: Henderson, Thomas R
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Avri Doria
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
• IETF 67 Streaming update...
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: DKIM Chair
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Lost Logitech headset
  • From: Xiaodong Lee
• Lost Logitech headset
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: John C Klensin
• lost and found
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Danny McPherson
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Bob Hinden
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Danny McPherson
• Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
  • From: Scott W Brim
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Danny McPherson
• Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
  • From: Pekka Savola
• [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
  • From: Scott W Brim
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• The Party?s Almost Over (But Not Quite)
  • From: Susan Estrada
• Found: lost SecureID card
  • From: John
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Bob Hinden
• IPv6 calls for the new Internet
  • From: Peter Sherbin
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• lost SecureID card
  • From: john . loughney
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: nomcom and confidentiality
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
  • From: Fred Baker
• On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
  • From: Sam Weiler
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• My availability for a new term as Operations & Management Area Director
  • From: David Kessens
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• IETF67 Network is up!
  • From: Jim Martin
• Re: The ietf blog should support atom
  • From: Robert Sayre
• The ietf blog should support atom
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• IASA Reports - IETF 67, San Diego
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Fwd: Factual correction
  • From: Martin Duerst
• RE: Interesting turn of events
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Interesting turn of events
  • From: Fred Baker
• IETF 67 audio-streaming, NOC info and webpage...
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• hokeyp and MIP6 slots are colliding
  • From: Madjid Nakhjiri
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: James M. Polk
• re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: Scary technology
  • From: Tim Chown
• Encouraging nominations for IETF Chair
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• FW: [Hubmib] Last Call: 'Managed Objects of EPON' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib)
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Scott W Brim
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• RFC Editor Letter of Intent
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Proper definitions of RFC-1212 and RFC-1215 not found
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• RE: References to XML 'documents'
  • From: Hollenbeck, Scott
• Proper definitions of RFC-1212 and RFC-1215 not found
  • From: Gaurav GOYAL
• RE: References to XML 'documents'
  • From: Misha Wolf
• RE: References to XML 'documents'
  • From: Hollenbeck, Scott
• Re: Scary technology
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Scary technology
  • From: Fred Baker
• References to XML 'documents'
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Joe Abley
• RE: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• RE: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
  • From: bmanning
• Re: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Alan DeKok
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Alan DeKok
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Alan DeKok
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Alan DeKok
• Re: My Corporation is building, designing the largest private Multicast network in the world
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• My Corporation is building, designing the largest private Multicast network in the world
  • From: Steve Giammarino (US)
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' toBCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to ...
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Inherent problems in the NEA architecture
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: NEA compelling problem (but no deployment)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Marcus Leech
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to ...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Nelson, David
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to ...
  • From: Scott Bradner
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Susan Thomson (sethomso)
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Marcus Leech
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Qualified participant: Was RE: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: DNS pollution
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: with merit?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: Theodore Tso
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Khosravi, Hormuzd M
• Re: Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Alan DeKok
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Differences between WG and non-WG mailing lists
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: RFC Compliance Certification Authority?
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: John Leslie
• RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Kyse Faril
• San Francisco Digital Inclusion Strategy
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: David Kessens
• Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: with merit?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for Nominations - NomCom06
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria (was: [...] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• NAT TRAVERSAL IN SIP THROUGH IMS
  • From: Ashfaaq H Poonawala
• Re: with merit?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: with merit?
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: with merit?
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: NAT TRAVERSAL IN SIP THROUGH IMS
  • From: Dan Wing
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Requirements for Open Positions
  • From: Fred Baker
• draft-iesg-discuss-criteria (was: [...] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: draft-iesg-discuss-criteria (was: [...] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: [David Kessens] DISCUSS: draft-carpenter-rescind-3683
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: with merit?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: legal issue of RFC3619
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: legal issue of RFC3619
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• with merit? (was: draft-kolkman-appeal-support)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: RFC Compliance Certification Authority?
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• Re: RFC Compliance Certification Authority?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Nea] Well into solution space: PA interop
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RFC Compliance Certification Authority?
  • From: jax871-ietf
• Re: event calendar
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: event calendar
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' toDraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' toDraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
  • From: Hollenbeck, Scott
• Re: legal issue of RFC3619
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' to DraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• legal issue of RFC3619
  • From: Bill Su
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' to DraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• RE: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' to DraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
  • From: Hollenbeck, Scott
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Stephen Hanna