Dave Crocker <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > However none cover the reason for Design Summaries (I'm changing the name, > a bit.) The nature of a Summary has the wg take a step back from daily > details and create a snapshot of the basic design and specification > decisions, to date, but not as a list of individual decisions (or open > issues.) This sounds as if it would be extremely helpful to folks sitting in on WG meetings during IETF Weeks... Can Dave point out any examples? -- John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf