IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Tony Finch
• The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: When registeration open?
  • From: Alexa Morris
• When registeration open?
  • From: cmccvic@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Koch
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DNS: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: [DNSOP] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [DNSOP] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Ralph Corderoy
• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Ralph Corderoy
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: DNS: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• RE: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Darcy Kevin (FCA)
• Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Hugo Maxwell Connery
• Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
• Re: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: DNS: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Ralph Corderoy
• Re: DNS: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• DNS: Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply.
  • From: Ralph Corderoy
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Michael Richardson
• re: [ietf94] Inquiry for IETF94 registation open time
  • From: Vic Liu(CMCC)
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jacob Appelbaum
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Chris Baker
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> (Time Capability in NETCONF) to Experimental RFC
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-02
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• RE: WG adoption threads
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Wendy Seltzer
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03.txt> (DNS Terminology) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Glen
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Hector Santos
• Call for community comment: draft-iab-xml2rfcv2-01
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Glen
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Paul Kyzivat
• RE: [CCAMP] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05 - Nits/editorial items
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• RE: [CCAMP] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05 - Nits/editorial items
  • From: Fatai Zhang
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: [CCAMP] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05 - Nits/editorial items
  • From: Black, David
• RE: [CCAMP] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05 - Nits/editorial items
  • From: Fatai Zhang
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: Last Call: <draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt> (Tracking Reviews of Documents) to Informational RFC
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Formal IESG Teleconference WebEx and Dial-in Information: August 6, 2015
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: t.p.
• RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Glen
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Job Snijders
• RE: [CCAMP] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05 - Nits/editorial items
  • From: Black, David
• RE: [CCAMP] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05 - Minor Issues
  • From: Black, David
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: IETF Mentoring Survey (Last Call - Ends August 7)
  • From: Nalini Elkins
• [ietf94] Inquiry for IETF94 registation open time
  • From: Vic Liu(CMCC)
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: t.p.
• Re: IETF Mentoring Survey (Last Call - Ends August 7)
  • From: t.p.
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Update Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Glen
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Glen
• Re: IETF Website Degradation
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03.txt> (DNS Terminology) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Rob Austein
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sandra Murphy
• RE: [CCAMP] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: thomas.morin
• IETF Mentoring Survey (Last Call - Ends August 7)
  • From: Nalini Elkins
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• RE: WG adoption threads
  • From: Hosnieh Rafiee
• Re: WG adoption threads
  • From: Sam Hartman
• WG adoption threads
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-05
  • From: Black, David
• Re: it's not end-to-end *versus* hop-by-hop for email (was: Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements)
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• it's not end-to-end *versus* hop-by-hop for email (was: Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15
  • From: Roni Even
• Request for volunteers or nominations to 2016 ICANN NomCom
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Aaron Zauner
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Mandelberg
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-02.txt> (Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers by Running One on Loopback) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-02.txt> (Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers by Running One on Loopback) to Informational RFC
  • From: David Mandelberg
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Aaron Zauner
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Aaron Zauner
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Rob Austein
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cice-01.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Client-Initiated Content-Encoding) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrick McManus
• Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
• RE: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-02.txt> (Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers by Running One on Loopback) to Informational RFC
  • From: Sunilkumar KS
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-02.txt> (Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers by Running One on Loopback) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Levine
• Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Gen-art 2nd LC review of draft-ietf-payload-vp8-16
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Gen-art 2nd LC review of draft-ietf-payload-vp8-16
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: [Netconf] Sec-Dir Review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.tx
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• RE: [Netconf] Sec-Dir Review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.tx
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Richard Hansen
• Re: Gen-art 2nd LC review of draft-ietf-payload-vp8-16
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [Netconf] Sec-Dir Review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.tx
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Snowden to the IETF: Please make an internet for users, not the spies • The Register
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Sec-Dir Review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.tx
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: New WGs...
  • From: Greg Shepherd
• RE: New WGs...
  • From: Hosnieh Rafiee
• New WGs...
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Aaron Zauner
• E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Aaron Zauner
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Alessandro Amirante
• New Version of draft-farrresnickel-harassment
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: John Curran
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01
  • From: Peter Yee
• Fwd: Four CSVW documents are W3C candidate recommendations
  • From: Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Warren Kumari
• RE: Pink Squares
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: stephen . farrell
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Alessandro Amirante
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: Meetecho overtime?
  • From: Meetecho IETF support
• Re: Meetecho overtime?
  • From: Nicolás
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: John Leslie
• Babel Mailing List
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Mentoring Program Survey
  • From: Nalini Elkins
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• RE: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: David Conrad
• RE: Pink Squares
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Curran
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Alexa Morris
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Pink Squares
  • From: Lou Berger
• Pink Squares
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Curran
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: thanks and kudos to Meetecho folks
  • From: John Levine
• RE: thanks and kudos to Meetecho folks
  • From: Jim Welch
• Re: thanks and kudos to Meetecho folks
  • From: Alejandro Acosta
• RE: thanks and kudos to Meetecho folks
  • From: Hosnieh Rafiee
• Re: thanks and kudos to Meetecho folks
  • From: Eliot Lear
• thanks and kudos to Meetecho folks
  • From: Keith Moore
• My slides from today's lunchtime talk
  • From: David Meyer
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bob Harold
• Re: Meetecho overtime?
  • From: Laurent Ciavaglia
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Meetecho overtime?
  • From: Lorenzo Miniero
• Meetecho overtime?
  • From: Laurent Ciavaglia
• TECH PLENARY session recording available
  • From: Meetecho Team
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• IETF network security - server-side authentication
  • From: Stefan Winter
• Re: Secdir review of draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-22
  • From: Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Soliciting questions, feedback, comments, and so on
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Soliciting questions, feedback, comments, and so on
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: Soliciting questions, feedback, comments, and so on
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Soliciting questions, feedback, comments, and so on
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Post-hoc working group chartering
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: domain names that are not DNS names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: domain names that are not DNS names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Soliciting questions, feedback, comments, and so on
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tim Wicinski
• Snowden to the IETF: Please make an internet for users, not the spies • The Register
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: domain names that aren't DNS names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Suzanne Woolf
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Suzanne Woolf
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: domain names that aren't DNS names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alec Muffett
• AW: [93all] IETF 93 - Breaks
  • From: Ruediger.Geib
• RE: [93all] IETF 93 - Breaks
  • From: Roubíček Zdeněk
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Non-Terminal Room (was: [93all] IETF 93 Network Information – Prague, Czech Republic)
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Non-Terminal Room (was: [93all] IETF 93 Network Information – Prague, Czech Republic)
  • From: t.p.
• Re: [93all] IETF 93 - Lunch Options and Meeting - UPDATE
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [93all] IETF 93 - Lunch Options and Meeting - UPDATE
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Wi-Fi privacy at IETF and IEEE802 meetings
  • From: Zuniga, Juan Carlos
• Cogito ergo sum
  • From: Hugo Maxwell Connery
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Cake
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Cake
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Cake
• IETF 93 - Lunch Options and Meeting Information
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• IETF 93 - Agenda Changes
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: Non-Terminal Room
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Non-Terminal Room
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Non-Terminal Room (was: [93all] IETF 93 Network Information – Prague, Czech Republic)
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Non-Terminal Room (was: [93all] IETF 93 Network Information – Prague, Czech Republic)
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Non-Terminal Room (was: [93all] IETF 93 Network Information – Prague, Czech Republic)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Non-Terminal Room (was: [93all] IETF 93 Network Information – Prague, Czech Republic)
  • From: Stefan Winter
• A little Tor Hidden Service
  • From: Hugo Maxwell Connery
• FW: [DNSOP] Tor frustration
  • From: Hugo Maxwell Connery
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tom Ritter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bob Harold
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Problem with RFC 4408
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Problem with RFC 4408
  • From: jannisohms
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-03
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tim Bruijnzeels
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Richard Hansen
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Conrad
• Could people try to distinguish Key Recovery and Mandatory Key Recovery?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Nomcom 2015: Result of random selection process
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Secdir review of draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-22
  • From: Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: Gen-art 2nd LC review of draft-ietf-payload-vp8-16
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Warren Kumari
• RE: [dhcwg] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Gen-art 2nd LC review of draft-ietf-payload-vp8-16 (with summary)
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Gen-art 2nd LC review of draft-ietf-payload-vp8-16
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-03
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: joel jaeggli
• IETF 93 - Agenda Changes
  • From: IETF Agenda
• IETF 93 - Early Bird Registration Deadline Today
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: who wants URNs, was horse left the barn (fwd)
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Sandy Wills
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Internet Society Briefing Panel at IETF 93
  • From: Matthew Ford
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05
  • From: Robert Sparks
• IETF 93 - Early Bird Fee Deadline Friday
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• RE: Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07
  • From: Bo Burman
• Re: Extended deadline July 15 - CFP: IEEE Green Standardization and Industry Issues at Globecom 2015
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07
  • From: Bo Burman
• IAB Re-Appoints Jonne Soininen as Liaison to the ICANN Board
  • From: IAB Chair
• Gen-ART Telechat review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Procedural queston (was: Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs))
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Procedural queston (was: Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs))
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt> (Tracking Reviews of Documents) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• Re: Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Internet draft lifecycle
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Ecrit] [new-work] WG Review: Selection of Language for Internet Media (slim)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Extended deadline July 15 - CFP: IEEE Green Standardization and Industry Issues at Globecom 2015
  • From: Jinsong Wu
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [new-work] WG Review: Selection of Language for Internet Media (slim)
  • From: Rosen, Brian
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: horse left the barn, etc, was <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: [new-work] WG Review: Selection of Language for Internet Media (slim)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Secdir review of draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-22
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01
  • From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: opaque, was Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: opaque, was Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-13
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: opaque, was Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: opaque, was Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis