Re: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jari,

>> One remaining issue is that I think when you said "octet size 0” in the
>> draft your probably meant “octet string size 0” or something along those
>> lines. Perhaps that could be changed as well.

Yes, we meant octet string size 0, will change it in the next version.

-Venkat.

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter, thank you again for the review, and this one is indeed a detailed
one! Based on -09 I think the authors have seen the review and have or
are checking the draft to make changes if needed.

One remaining issue is that I think when you said "octet size 0” in the
draft your probably meant “octet string size 0” or something along those
lines. Perhaps that could be changed as well.

FYI: The draft is on tomorrow’s IESG telechat, and I have balloted
no-objection.

Jari




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]