I disagree with this as an absolute statement there are times, not all that often but actual cases, where a technical RFC has been progressed on the standards track without creating a new RFC it does take developing information about implementations etc, bit that info does not go into a RFC Scott > On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:06 PM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 8/11/2015 2:03 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> There is no end-run. The IESG might conclude from the discussion that there >> is no rough consensus to reclassify the RFC. > > IMO, reclassifying an existing RFC that isn't to "Historic" is an end-run. > > Joe >