On 01/09/2015 16:26, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:05 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> One way out is to decouple this question from RFC7437bis by >>> designing an RFC3933 Process Experiment (i.e. try out an >>> alternative qualification rule for a couple of years, >>> reverting to the current rule afterwards by default). >> >> This may be too radical but, in the spirit of allowing people to >> apply discretion, let me success such a process experiment based >> on the principle that the reason for Nomcom-volunteer >> qualification rules is to be sure that the selecting members of >> the Nomcom have a reasonable understanding of the IETF and how >> it works. For the purpose of this experiment, >> [...] >> > > For my own clarification, would we publish the current draft without > changing the qualification criteria, and then either revise and republish > or do an "Updates" draft after the process experiment? Or would we run the > experiment and hold the draft until the experiment is done? My suggestion was the first one: publish what you have now, then try the experiment. Experiments can fail. Brian