Re: NomCom procedures revision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/08/2015 16:01, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Some months ago I started the work of editing a revision to the NomCom
> procedures (RFC7437bis).  We made progress on some points, but seem to have
> stalled on revising the requirements for qualifying to serve on NomCom.
> 
> The draft I have recently expired.  Is there any interest in taking another
> run at this now?  Alternatively, is it worth publishing what we did
> accomplish, and leaving that one point for a later attempt?

Since you ask, I continue to feel that the 3/5 rule is restrictive for people
who have limited travel possibilities but have significant IETF experience.
Maybe we could have another week on that question, and then go with what we
have (with Harald's tweaks)?

So...

"  Members of the IETF community must have attended at least three of
   the last five IETF meetings in order to volunteer."

One quick fix is to change it to "three of the last six" which would
allow for a whole year of no travel and would not be hard to administer.
Another would be to add an alternative qualification "or five of the last
ten" to allow for longer-term regular participants. Either way, I think
that attending 50% of meetings should be enough.

   Brian

> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis/
> 
> -MSK
> 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]