Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> It’s quite possible that the appropriate tradeoff for society
>> continues to be that as documented in RFC1984, but it should be
>> recognized as an actual tradeoff and not an an approach without any
>> impact to lawful enforcement activities (as might be implied from your
>> comments above.)
> 
> sorry, i can't resist
> 
> We should not be building surveillance technology into standards.  Law
> enforcement was not supposed to be easy.  Where it is easy, it's called a
> police state.  -- Jeff Schiller

Randy - 
 
  Actually, that is a perfect example of my point - Jeff’s quote (with respect
  to not including surveillance technology) actually acknowledges that there 
  is an impact as a result that choice; i.e. ‘LE not supposed to be easy.’

  That’s quite different than some of the assertions on this list implying that 
  RFC1984 has no impact to LEA activities…  If the IETF is going to make
  a statement, it should be an intellectually honest one and acknowledge
  that there could be an LEA impact, but even so, that outcome is still the 
  desirable tradeoff in the circumstances.  

/John

Disclaimer: my views alone.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]