Thanks for bringing this to IAOC, Benson!
A particular intricate problem is the potential IPR rule confliction between IETF and other open source community/foundation, if a project is brought
to Hackathon from that community/foundation. This is especially problematic for patent, where usually many open sources require free licensing, contrastively IETF requires disclosure only if one knows.
-
Miao From: Benson Schliesser [mailto:bensons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> writes: I think that both of you are correct, as quoted above. Of course, please note well that a Contribution to the IETF does not necessarily have to take the form of a document. Thus, I think it is reasonable to question whether code developed during the Hackathon is considered
a Contribution to the IETF. I am uncertain whether Hackathon code is inherently Contributed by nature of being developed under the Note Well etc, or whether its Contribution status is optional based on the author's intent. I believe the latter is the case,
but that is an open question to be confirmed. I've asked the rest of the IAOC Legal Committee and the IETF's counsel to discuss this question. Even if code developed at a Hackathon is a Contribution (either inherently or optionally), under IETF IPR rules the original author retains ownership rights to the work and thus should be able to contribute it to non-IETF
open source projects as long as those projects accept contributions under a compatible license. Likewise, existing "outside" open source code that is used at a Hackathon is not necessarily a Contribution to the IETF unless the IPR owner (e.g. original author)
intends for it to be Contributed. Both of these aspects (outgoing and incoming code) need to be described more clearly for the benefit of the Hackathon community, and so I've also asked the IAOC Legal Committee and IETF counsel to discuss this topic as well. We will attempt to provide some additional guidance to the community after we've performed appropriate diligence. -Benson |