On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:33:39PM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> as far as I can tell people favor various LHS-hashing variants for privacy
> reasons. Assuming that this observation is correct, I consider current hashing
> scheme totally insufficient - it does not protect anyone's privacy against
> even against moderately-funded attackers. We should do better (not only to
> please Snowden :-)
For the record, similar observations from the WG discussion.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg08046.html
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg08017.html
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg08065.html
[ I agree that hashing is not a substantial privacy enhancement.
The original reason hashing was proposed was not privacy-related. ]
--
Viktor.