Updating what I wrote: On 8/10/15 8:42 PM, Eliot Lear wrote: > Which brings me to a final point. Somewhere in this process, someone > (preferably either a shepherding AD or the person requesting the change) > can surely articulate the reasoning for this change. I'm actually not > aware of any other informational document being upgraded to BCP, so I > don't know what has been done in the past or what process was used, but > I was surprised that this wasn't in a write-up somewhere when the LC > announcement issued. > Sorry- I missed the write-up the first time. The question I would still like clearly answered is the one that Dave Crocker asked. What is the intended effect? Thanks, Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature