Re: The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
From: Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:52:53 -0500
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <55CB4B5B.80700@alvestrand.no>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:34:19PM +0200, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> RFC numbers are cheap. (The debate required to agree on the text may not
> be.)

And the labor to edit new RFCs is also not cheap.  We could have
produced a modern replacement for RFC 20.

Nico
--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
  - From: Harald Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Re: [94attendees] When registeration open?
Next by Date: Re: [94attendees] When registeration open?
Previous by thread: Re: The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
Next by thread: Re: The RFC 20 rationale (was: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]