Re: Proposal for a Clean Internet (by design)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




You said:

"....

Pornography of any form

Gambling

Sex-driven sites (excluding dating sites which require reasonable decorum)

Racist sites

Inflammatory sites

Sites promoting or discussing illegal activity (as a general theme- 
the intent is never to prohibit open discussion: free speech is what 
makes laws so strong- they can stand examination)

Sites which promote consumption of conciousness-altering substances, 
including caffeine, nicotine and ethanol

...."

Exactly WHO gets to define these concepts? What is legal in country X 
may be illegal in country Y, etc. What is consider "decorum" or even
"open discussion" [Google for "Tank Man"] also varies greatly by region
and culture.

Generally speaking, Layer 9 solutions do not tend to work well when 
applied on any larger scale.

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Office:  +1 415-550-9433
Cell:    +1 415-370-4628
UK Cell: +44 7805 977889
docomo: (090) 3337-9311
Web: protocoljournal.org
E-mail: olejacobsen@xxxxxx
E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: organdemo






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]