RE: WG adoption threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "'IETF discussion list'" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: WG adoption threads
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:05:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <CADnDZ8-9FvGqxPd0nC86=57ODyQWqgaYMdLpraZtLUR+5R028g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AQFAUDN2FzrtMD3XNKh3faUJ+IrH6gI4jWvGnw/wTVA=

This might help http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/edu/attachment/wiki/IETF78/IETF78-WGchairs-Adrian-Farrel.ppt?format=raw

>I'm not asking whether it's right or wrong, just whether such
> a message helps the WG Chairs in evaluating consensus.

References:
- WG adoption threads
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: WG adoption threads
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun

Prev by Date: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: WG adoption threads
Next by thread: IETF Mentoring Survey (Last Call - Ends August 7)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]