Hiya, On 11/08/15 17:56, Michael Richardson wrote: > > I would propose that the new BCP be the set of 1984 and RFC2804 (which is > also informational). > I also think that this would be proceedurally make more sense. I did ponder that a bit but my own conclusion fwiw was that the topics are sufficiently different that keeping them separate could be better and would be simpler. And if we wanted 2804 as a BCP that could be done after we see what folks think of this status-change. I do agree that it'd be sensible to consider following the same path with both of these at some point, though I'd say it's maybe simpler to take 'em one at a time. S. > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature