RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Russ,

Let me use an example.
Suppose there are four (k=4) RBridges: RB1, RB2, RB3 and RB4. Their SystemIDs are 001, 010, 011 and 100. Suppose the LAALP ID is 1. Then the four concatenations are 0011, 0101, 0111 and 1001 while the four 'mod' values are 3, 2, 3, 1. So, these are not always the same, even for the same LAALP ID. 

For the above example, the sorted list would be (RB4, RB2, RB1, RB3). Here, RB1 and RB3 have been sorted using their unsigned-integer-SystemID as a tie-breaker. Have I cleared the doubt?

Thanks,
Mingui

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 12:19 AM
> To: draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname.all@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: IETF Gen-ART; IETF
> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-06
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.  The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call
> comments.  For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-06
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2015-09-11
> IETF LC End Date: 2015-09-01
> IESG Telechat date: 2015-09-17
> 
> Summary: Almost Ready
> 
> Thanks for resolving my comments on the -05 version of this document.
> 
> Remaining Concern:
> 
> Building on the comment from my previous review on Section 5.2, Step 1:
> 
> Your response said, "The sort is done in the per-LAALP base. It's not necessary
> to make the LAALP ID to a constant length. Besides, the 'mod'
> function always returns a value in [0, k-1] whatever the length of LAALP ID is."
> The role of the 'mod' function was clear to me.
> 
> In Section 5.2, Step 1, the updated text says, "System ID and LAALP ID are
> considered as byte strings", but the Step 2 text refers to "the numerically
> sorted list".  If all of the System IDs are the same length, then these are
> obviously the same.  Is that always the case?





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]