>>>>> "Hallam-Baker," == Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hallam-Baker,> That is empirically not true. At this point we have
Hallam-Baker,> precisely two cryptographic security protocols that
Hallam-Baker,> can be regarded as a success: SSL and WEP. And the
Hallam-Baker,> original design of both was botched.
Sorry, I'd say Kerberos is a success as well as ssh. Both of them
demonstrate the point you're trying to make though.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf