Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julian Reschke wrote:

> IMHO it would be a good idea in the sense of "own dogfood" not to
> serve XHTML content with media type text/html.

Matter of taste, from my POV XHTML 1.0 transitional is the best way
to create backwards compatible (HTML 3.2) content "visible with any
browser".
  
Or as the ion-ion-format draft puts it:  "no fancy features".  If my
old browser sees some real XML it simply starts my text editor... ;-)

>> The HTML output of xml2rfc is rather ugly with my browser, and its
>> nice unpaginated output doesn't offer meta-data and I18N, tough :-(
 
> I18N?

Non-ASCII, the xml2rfc "txt" or "unpg" output is ASCII.  The HTML of
rfcmarkup is very nice, but at that point all meta-data and non-ASCII
is already lost.  Maybe xml2rfc should get a new XHTML output option,
not your "dogfod" of course, normal XHTML 1.0 transitional text/html.

Frank



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]