Excuse me for interruting at this juncture; I am reading news 'Search for
the next Google,' and as
I have a somewhat antiquaited (by now!) proposal to the INDUSTRY for a
SEARCH ENGINE that would be weighted in favor of the FRENCH-LANGUAGE, which
would be called "OIEAU" ('Wow!')
Just thought I would ANNOUNCE this PROPOSAL again in the NEW YEAR...for
LEGAL REASONS...
OIEAU Copyright 2007 Casey Farrell
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx>
CC: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: "Discuss" criteria
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:21:37 +0100
John Leslie wrote:
This is venturing into dangerous territory. The best expertise on
the technical issues involved _should_ be in the WG that produced the
document. Expecting to find _better_ expertise within the IESG seems
less than rational...
Expecting the best available expertise on charset issues and string
matching in the Kerberos WG is, in my opinion, less than rational.
But the Kerberos WG still has to define protocol operations where strings
are compared.
Sometimes a WG needs help with issues outside their core purview, and
sometimes they won't discover that until their documents hit the IESG.
That's life.
(apologies to the Kerberos folks, who, I think, are now very much educated
on those specific issues, for using them as an example....)
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_________________________________________________________________
Type your favorite song. Get a customized station. Try MSN Radio powered
by Pandora. http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf