"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > By the way, would it be possible for all DISCUSSes and COMMENTs for > I-Ds originated by a working group to be *automatically* copied to the > mailing list of the working group? The reasons are: > - the WG chairs, editors, and interested parties should > not have to monitor the I-D tracker to spot them > - there is otherwise no automatic archiving of the > follow-up discussions > - it can often be hard to tell from the record > how/if/why a DISCUSS was cleared (the entries in > the I-D tracker do not usually show this information) > - the WG has an obvious interest in the follow-up > discussions > - if the discussions result in changes to the I-D the > WG really needs to be kept in the loop I agree, something along those steps seems quite useful. My experience is that not all of the people who have an interest in a document reads and thinks about DISCUSS/COMMENT's. In some cases, I recall that COMMENTs were not even forwarded to me as document author, I had to find them in the I-D tracker myself. I think this has changed now, but doing what you suggest would go even further to make sure that the IESG comments are widely seen and thought about. /Simon _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf