"Discuss" criteria

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian E Carpenter wrote:
But, Brian, the concern for costs ought to extend much farther, such as to the kinds of issues raised by an IESG Discuss so that the AD provides an explanation of the benefit that justifies the considerable cost in delay
and wg effort they are imposing...

Hence the DISCUSS criteria document, which is a work in progress (and likely
to become an ION).


Brian,

Which document are you referring to?

The one that I thought you meant has an I-D Tracker status of "dead" and is no longer an I-D:

  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi?command=id_detail&id=13314>

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]