Michael Thomas schrieb:
...
those in WG last call when the WG is far more responsive to dealing
with issues? These "IESG Surprises" really hurt the community by
leading to the general perception that the IESG is capricious in a
royally anointed kind of way.
Mike
And things get even worse when the response to the "IESG Surprise" is:
we will fix that during AUTH48. There's absolutely no transparency in
that, and no checking by the community.
I'd really like to see the IESG stop sending documents with known
defects to the RFC Editor.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf