On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:09:21 -0800 Michael Thomas <mat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The other thing that occurs to me -- and I know this has been brought > up in many different forms -- is that if an AD _was_ following the > working group to some degree, why is it legitimate for them to wait > for IESG evaluation to voice comments that affect the protocol's > operation? Most ADs don't follow most WGs in any detail -- they can't possibly do so. They should (and generally do) follow their own WGs, possibly the others in their area, plus one or two elsewhere that they're personally interested in. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf