Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I received four of these, apparently on the strength of being an RFC author, and was immediately sure there had been a mistake.

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:

Judging from the email addresses where I received solicitations for comments, either every RFC author or every I-D author received an invitation to comment. (I suspect the latter, since the invitations seemed to be tailored by working group, i.e., an I-D in a Transport working group "earned" an invitation that included Transport candidates.)� Calling a candidate list distributed to all I-D authors private is polite fiction. I don't object to this effective public candidacy, but honesty in labeling might be called for.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]