Janet, See inline, Cheers, Martin Janet wrote: The mis-perception that the WG is focused on "precedence and preemption" is, unfortunately, reinforced by the list of milestones, which focus on the "military" environment. I would also, as an individual, favor modification to the list of milestones to include milestones that are clearly not associated with "precedence and preemption". >>MCD>> The main authors have a certain focus in their writing, but this can be moderated with input from others (e.g., those representing the ETS community, as an example). For this to occur though, the environment for providing input needs to be a bit more "friendly" (for lack of a better term). In addition, as I stated earlier on this topic there is not one forum that can address all of the industries needs. There is a place for the IETF, ATIS and the ITU, and we should avoid "forum bashing", as it leads us no where. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf