On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
2. There's clearly a need, if the work is to be expanded into new applications areas, for the experts in those applications to be deeply involved. That is in fact the main argument why the work should be done in the IETF if it's done at all. I understand that this would need a major injection of new blood into the WG. That won't happen by means of a simple re-charter. It needs an impetus that would be noticed throughout the IETF.
An alternative to trying to get all the application specialists in a RAI WG would be to try to get folks from RAI to other areas. That would be similar to what v6ops WG did 3-4 years ago.
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf