I'm speaking here as an individual. I'd like to build consensus for my position both within the IESG and within the community, but I realize that if I fail to build that consensus, I cannot make this objection as a single IESG member.ken> Its now been about 2 weeks since the last comment was sent on ken> this thread. Do you feel you have reached consensus? I sent my IESG comments two weeks ago, and Jon should be following up with the WG chairs.
Since I (and most of the IETF list) don't have access to that private correspondence, I don't know if your comments addressed my above question of whether you feel there was consensus reached given your original statement/position. I won't ask you to repeat your private comments, but I would appreciate your feedback on my question given the amount of correspondence on the IETF list concerning this thread.
As a side note, I'm a little surprised that your concluding(?) remarks were made in private. When I had sent you a private comment on this thread a couple of weeks ago, you had responded with a desire that I keep my correspondence in public. I guess its just me, but it just feels that your action is a bit inconsistent.
regards, -ken _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf