RE: Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches

["Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You probably want to post your question to two different WG mailing lists.  The first is speermint and the second is enum.

 

http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/speermint-charter.html

 

http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/enum-charter.html

 

Regards

Jason

---

From: Ramirez, Luis [mailto:luis_c.ramirez@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:31 PM
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches

Hello,

 

We are trying to deploy an IMS network but we have an interoperability problem between 2 Softswitches that we have in our NGN network, one of them supports SIP-I (based on ITU-T Q.1912.5) and the other one supports SIP-T (based on RFC 3398). We need to define which standard is better, thinking on that our next step is to implement an IMS network. Could you please give me any suggestion with the related argumentation?

 

Thanks a lot,

 

Luis Carlos Ramirez Alonso

_________________________________

Siemens S.A.

Communications

Fixed Networks

Av. Don Diego Cisneros Edif. Siemens, Caracas

Venezuela

Tel. +58.212.203.8298

Fax +58.212.203.8636 

Cel. +58.412.203.8724

E-Mail: luis_c.ramirez@siemens.com

Website: http://www.siemens.com/surpass

 

The new company Nokia Siemens Networks is expected to start operations by January 1, 2007, subject to customary regulatory approvals, the completion of standard closing conditions, and the agreement of a number of detailed implementation steps

 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf